Nikon D3300 Reviews 2014

Can the D3300 Deliver everything that's expected from an entry-level model that's out to target the first time DSLR buyer?

Nikon D3300 evaluations - Nikon's entry level DSLR range has long benefited from a drip down effect, owing to the company's substantial stable of enthusiast and high end models. The Nikon D3300 follows on from the popularity of the D3100 and D3200, and its 24.2 MP sensor has sent the anti aliasing filter removed to see an improvement in sharpness.

Read more 8 Digital Camera Very Deals On Market

The introduction of Nikon's new EXPEED 4 image processor has two key benefits. Not only has it increased the maximum ISO to 25.600, the continuous shooting rate has also improved from 4fps to 5fps. On the rear, the D3300 maintains the same 4in, 920k-dot LCD as seen on its predecessor. It also set ups, sporting the 420-pixel RGB sensor and 11 point AF system that served the D3200 well.

One feature that debuted on the D3200 and retained in the D3300 is the model's graphical rear display. THe graphics represent aperture, shutter and ISO sensitivity, giving beginners a visual reference point to the settings they're changing. The aperture graphic is particularly pleasing, with it getting larger and smaller relative to the size selected. There's also a? button which can be pressed in conjunction with any of the settings which the activates a more in depth explanation of the settings beings used, serving almost as a built in instruction manual for those new to DSLR photography. THe body is constructed from the same polycarbonate as the D3200, and in terms of dimensions it's just 1mm thinner and 1mm shallower than its predecessor, although it is 2mm taller. The body itself is some 25g lighter, while the redesigned standard kit lens now has a collapsible design to make it some 30% smaller and 25% lighter.(Nikon D3300 critiques )

Nikon D3300 testimonials - The optical viewfinder is another area of improvement, with its 0.85x magnification being superior to 0.78x on the D3200. On the whole, the AF system delivers and entry level users should find the level of performance fairly comprehensive. While the 11 point AF coverage is never going to be quite as comprehensive as that found on systems with higher AF point counts, the 11 points themselves are well spread out across the frame. In use, the D3300 meets its 5fps shooting speed and the way it excels in this area, much like close rivals such as the Canon EOS 100D, is a welcome plus. (Nikon D3300 testimonials)

Nikon D3300 opinions - With regard to image quality, the standard colour setting delivers a pleasingly natural palette, while if you want a bit more oomph from your image then the "vivid" preset mode does a great job of lighting a scene. The sensor delivers an impressive dynamic range, which is more in line with cameras higher up Nikon's range, and thanks to the high pixel count and the removal of the low pass filter, the D3300 resolved 34 lines per mm (lpmm) on our test chart, reducing to 28 lpmm at ISO 6400 very impressive performance. ALthough there are signs of colour noise at ISO 800. it's not until ISO 12.800 is reached that luminance noise becomes a rea issue.

Nikon D3300 Verdict
The Nikon D3300 is a good demonstration of what entry level DSLRs can offer. it does lack inbuilt Wi-fi connectivity. THough this is probably understandable owing to the impressively low price tag. On the whole if you;re after an entry level DSLR with a high resolution yet don't want to break the bank, the D3300 should be near the top of your wish list.

Nikon D3300 is Best For
- Novices looking to step up to DSLRs
- if you want to learn advanced DSLR features as you shooting
- HD video with the option to attach an external mic

Pros
- Low price tag
- Impressive burst mode
- Reduction in size kit lens
- High resolution captures masses of detail

Cons
- Lack of built in Wi-fi might disappoint some users
- Issues with noise apparent at lower ISO settings

US >>Click here To Buy Nikon D3300 Camera<<

UK >>Click here To Buy Nikon D3300 Camera<<

Amateur Photography

Nikon D3300 Reviews 2014 Nikon D3300 critiques,Nikon D3300 testimonials,Nikon D3300 opinions,nikon d3200 best buy,best buy nikon d3200 body only,nikon d3200 best price,nikon d3200 price best buy,nikon d3200 bundle best buy Andrian Manhatan Nikon D3300

4.5 / 5

NIKON D610 VS D800 : Release Date, Rumors, Price, Prezzo, Preis and Prix

Nikon D610 : A blend of old and new in this full-frame

Amateur Photography

Announced at the end of 2013, the full-frame D610 replaces the Nikon D600. The revamp includes an improved shutter unit, a slightly faster burst rate of 6fps, and what Nikon claims is a more accurate white balance system. In other respects, the Nikon D610 already looks a bit behind the times, relying on an Expeed 3 image processor where the D3300, the D5300 and the D4s have Expeed 4.

The design and control layout look practically the same as the D7100. As we’ve come to expect, the D610 beats its Canon 6D rival in the resolution stakes, with a 24.3MP sensor, although this time there’s a low-pass filter fitted, unlike in the D5300 and D7100. However, the D610’s maximum sensitivity setting is ISO 6,400 in the standard range, and ISO 25,600 in expanded mode.

The Canon 6D’s standard range equals the Nikon’s expanded range, while going two stops higher in expanded mode to ISO 102,400.As in the D5300, there’s a 39-point autofocus system, but here the points are clustered closer to the centre of the frame. This makes the large number of individual points less of an attraction.

US >>Check Prices Is right for NIKON D610<<

UK >>Check Prices Is right for NIKON D610<<

PERFORMANCE

The updated white balance system is pretty good, but we found many shots took on a slightly green cast. Metering is also inconsistent compared with the 6D. Autofocus accuracy is best if you stick to the nine cross-type AF points, especially for moving targets. Overall, the Canon 6D gives better results, especially in low light.

NIKON D610 VS D800 Analyst

Read more inside.massart & 64 Visual Information Equipment

Nikon D810 : A new sensor with no AA filter and an updated processing engine for better image quality

Nikon’s D800 and D800E caused great excitement when they were first announced in February 2012 – largely because of their ground-breaking 36-million pixel count and their impressive detail resolution. So it’s great news that Nikon claims their replacement, the 36.3MP D810, produces “the highest image quality in Nikon’s history”.

Apparently, the filter over the D800E’s sensor still had some anti -aliasing (AA) properties. Removing AA entirely for the Nikon D810 should enable it to record even more sharp detail. Nikon has also made changes to the D810’s shutter to produce less vibration and reduce blurring. It’s exciting that the D810 has the same 51- point Multi CAM 3500FX AF system (with Group  -area AF) as the class- leading D4S. The maximum continuous shooting rate has increased at full resolution to 5fps (previously 4fps) – and the buffer when shooting in RAW has been doubled . I’m looking forward to seeing how the D810 handles noise, because although the D800 is good for a 36MP camera, noise is still a limiting factor. What ilike: The potential for more detail; better noise control; a split -screen Live View image for assessing depth of field What idon’t like: Built -in Wi -Fi connectivity would’ve been really useful for controlling the camera remotely.

So low ISO!

Unusually, the D810 has a native sensitivity range of ISO 64  -12,800 and there are expansion settings stretching from ISO 32 to ISO 51,200, giving greater scope for shooting at wide apertures or in bright conditions as well as greater low- light capability. The lower ISO settings of the D810 should prove to be especially useful for a camera that I’d expect to be predominantly used on a tripod.

US >>Check Prices Is right for NIKON D800<<

UK >>Check Prices Is right for NIKON D800<<

FUJINON LENS REVIEWS

We test Fujifilm's new wide aperture portrait lens for the X series

Fujinon Lens Reviews - Fujifilm has done well to create a range of 12 lenses since it launched the X-pro1, including this latest lens. Designed to be used with the APS-C sensors of the Fuji X system, the XF 56mm f/1.2 R provides a similar angle of view to what we'd expect of an 85mm lens on a full frame camera. it has 11 elements in eight groups, and uses one a spherical and two low dispersion elements. Fuji has used its chromatic controlling lenses directly behind the forward element, which is unusually small in relative diameter for a fast aperture lens of this type.

FUJINON LENS

As with nearly all fixed focal length X lenses, the XF 56mm's aperture ring clicks delightfully, if a little loosely, in 1/3 stops between f/1.4 and f/16 - there are no clicks between f/1.2 and f/1.4.

with a lens cap of only 62mm, the XF 56mm is shorter, narrower and lighter than the equivalents lens from Panasonic's G system - even though the G cameras use a smaller sensor. The G cameras use a smaller sensor. The lens is well built and the metal barrel and finely ribbed focusing ring fell good to the touch.

Disappointingly, though, the lens has a plastic hood not a metal one.

The lens sits comfortable on both the X-pro1 and X-T1 bodies, though the more substantial grip, both back and front, of the SLR style X-T1 allows more secure and balanced purchase, Fuji places the aperture ring closest to the mount, so fingers of the supporting hand can find it easily an without you having to shift the holding position of either camera.

The is a bit of whirring while and X-series camera focuses, and it seems to longer (or at least bigger) the lens, the longer it takes to focus. The 56mm has more glass to move than any other fixed lens in the system, and neither the X-pro1 nor the X-T1 is especially deft at shifting it. The host body's ability to make the lens work well definitely affects what you will be able to achieve. also, none of the Fuji bodies has a native ISO 100 setting, so you'll be limited in getting use out of the f/1.2 aperture in daylight.

As for image quality, lenses with wide apertures tend to produce a lot of corner shading, and while the XF 56mm's illumination is indeed less than uniform across the frame, the effect can only really be seen in images of flat, evenly lit areas. For most natural subjects, it will be fine.

Sharpness and detail are good, even when the lens is used wide open. The resolution of captured images obviously increased as i closed down, and i detected a peak between f/4 and f/5.6 and then a decline to f/16. This is based on quite close focus, such as when shooting a waist up portrait. However, as the subject distance increases, sharpness and detail decrease, so by the time i was shooting full length portraits, my images looked decidedly soft. The softness may be due to fringing and a subsequent de fringing exercise in camera, or slightly missed focused at wide apertures. The quality of out of focus highlights are mostly pleasant, which is important to wide aperture shooters. They tend to head towards the frame edges, and from f/2 they are more heptagonal, resulting in a less "creamy" look.

Pros
- Good focal length for serious portrait photographers
- Wide aperture
- Sharpness and detail
- Value for money

Cons
- Many Fuji CSCs are limited to shooting at up to 1/4000sec, making it difficult to use the lens's wide aperture outdoors in extremely bright conditions

US >> The price is right Fujinon <<

UK >> The price is right Fujinon <<